Lesson Learned: Start Small, Stay Sane

-

Lesson Learned: Start Small, Stay Sane

Posted by Justin Minnaar

Over the past few days, I’ve learned a hard but valuable lesson — one I think many developers and creators can relate to.

I was rushing to build a product. I had a vision, a roadmap, and a thousand ideas swirling in my head. I wanted it all: a sleek design, robust features, scalability, security, CI/CD pipelines, database management, user authentication... the whole commercial-grade package.

But somewhere along the way, I got overwhelmed. The complexity snowballed. I found myself lost in the weeds — trying to anticipate every future use case, every edge condition, every possible feature. And instead of progress, I hit paralysis.

The Turning Point

The breakthrough came when I reminded myself of something deceptively simple: start small.

So, I’ve reset. I’m now building from the ground up using a basic framework. My first goal? Just get the home page working. Nothing fancy — just something visible, functional, and stable.

Once that’s done:

  • I’ll check in the code.
  • Run tests to ensure stability.
  • Deploy it safely.

Then, and only then, I’ll begin implementing one feature at a time. Each feature will go through its own cycle:

  1. Build it.
  2. Test it.
  3. Deploy it for staging.
  4. Sign it off.
  5. Push it to production.

Why This Matters

It sounds like common sense, and it is. But when you're deep in the trenches of building something meaningful, it's easy to forget. The complexity of commercial web development is real. From databases to scaling, from CI/CD to security, it’s a lot.

But trying to solve everything at once is a recipe for burnout.

Moving Forward

This blog is mostly for me — a reminder not to repeat the same mistake. But if you’re reading this and you’ve felt the same pressure, I hope it helps you too.

Start small. Build steadily. Keep your sanity.

I’ll be sharing a short video version of this soon on my YouTube channel — stay tuned.

Thanks for reading. If you’ve had similar experiences or lessons learned, I’d love to hear them in the comments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
 Blogging with style It would be nice to have the power of a tool like Confluence for editing my blogs, so I could include code samples by using the ` or ``` commands, Sample Code  And back to normal code.
Read more

C# 8.0 nullable operator

-
I converted one of our libraries to C# 8.0 and turned on the 'nullable' and 'nullable references' options. I was pleasantly surprised to find several potential bugs where the passing of a null value would have caused a null exception, and it was simple enough to fix these. (This library was built without unit tests, horror!) I found a few interesting things though. In the following function, we receive a warning from the compiler about a possible null dereference error. At first I wondered if using the base string functions, instead of the above, would resolve this: var value = "some string"; var empty = string.IsNullOrEmpty(value); if (empty) return; value = value.Trim(); // still getting a possible null deference So I changed the code to the following, and the problem goes away: var value = "some string"; if (x.IsNullOrEmpty()) return; value = value.Trim(); // still getting a possible null deference And then removed the function c...
Read more